
Saxony-Anhalt Election 2025: What It Means for Migrants in Germany
The AfD could make history in Saxony-Anhalt's state election. Here's what that means for migrants and people with a migration background living in Germany.

Germany has long maintained that deportations to Afghanistan are reserved for individuals who pose a security risk or have committed serious crimes. That line now appears to be blurring. The German government recently defended its decision to deport an Afghan national who had not been convicted of any crime — a move that has alarmed human rights organizations, lawyers, and the broader Afghan community in Germany. For the estimated 200,000+ Afghans living in Germany, many of whom fled the Taliban takeover in 2021, this development raises urgent and deeply personal questions about the security of their residency status.
The deportation in question involved an Afghan individual who, according to official statements, had not received a criminal conviction. The German government nonetheless defended the removal, citing grounds that go beyond criminal conduct. While the government has not fully disclosed all details of the case, the public defense of the action signals a potential broadening of the criteria used to justify deportations to Afghanistan.
This is significant because Germany had previously suspended most deportations to Afghanistan following the Taliban's return to power in August 2021, citing the dangerous security situation there. A limited resumption of deportations of convicted criminals began in 2024, drawing international criticism. The latest case appears to push that boundary further.
For expats and immigrants — especially those from Afghanistan — the message is unsettling: even without a criminal record, a person's continued stay in Germany may no longer be guaranteed.
Under German and European law, deportations are generally barred when a person faces serious danger upon return — a principle known as non-refoulement. Human rights organizations argue that Afghanistan under Taliban rule qualifies as such a danger for most of the population, particularly women, ethnic minorities, and former government employees.
Critics of the recent deportation argue that expanding removals to non-convicted individuals weakens these legal protections and sets a troubling precedent. Refugee advocacy groups have called on the government to clarify the legal basis for the decision and to ensure due process for all affected individuals.
Politically, the move comes amid growing pressure from conservative parties to take a harder line on migration. The current coalition government has faced sustained public and parliamentary debate over immigration enforcement, and this deportation may reflect a broader policy shift rather than an isolated case.
While this specific case involved one individual, the implications reach far wider:
It is important to note that individual circumstances vary enormously. The safest course of action is always to seek qualified legal advice specific to your situation.
If you or someone you know is an Afghan national in Germany and concerned about their residency status, there are concrete steps to take:
Yes, under certain circumstances. German law allows deportation based on reasons beyond criminal conviction, including failure to meet residence permit conditions, rejection of an asylum claim, or — as this case suggests — other grounds the government considers sufficient. However, any deportation must theoretically respect the non-refoulement principle if the destination country is deemed dangerous. Legal challenges to such deportations are possible and have succeeded in the past.
A valid Aufenthaltstitel provides significant legal protection and cannot simply be revoked without a formal process that includes notification and the right to appeal. However, it is not an absolute guarantee, especially if the permit is temporary or if your circumstances change. If you hold a Niederlassungserlaubnis (permanent settlement permit), your protection is considerably stronger. When in doubt, consult a lawyer.
Many cities have refugee and migration counseling services (Migrationsberatung) funded by the federal or state government that offer free advice. Pro Asyl maintains a nationwide network. The Diakonie, Caritas, and AWO also provide support. Your local Ausländerbehörde can tell you which services are available in your area, though for legal disputes, an independent lawyer is strongly recommended.
This case is a reminder that immigration policy in Germany is not static. Rules and enforcement practices can shift — and those shifts have real consequences for real people. If you are an Afghan national or know someone who is, now is the time to review your documents, understand your legal status, and build a relationship with a trusted legal advisor before any urgent situation arises. Proactive preparation is always better than crisis management.
Stay informed, know your rights, and do not hesitate to seek professional help.
Source: The Local (Germany)
Want news like this in your inbox?
The most relevant news for expats in Germany, no noise.

The AfD could make history in Saxony-Anhalt's state election. Here's what that means for migrants and people with a migration background living in Germany.

The AfD is using provocative live streamers to amplify its political message in Germany. Here's what this media strategy means for the political climate expats live in.

Unions, churches and sports clubs join forces to offer practical help to victims of right-wing extremist attacks and threats in Germany — including support for volunteers.