For many people living in Germany with subsidiary protection status, one of the most painful realities is being separated from their closest family members. Since a suspension of family reunification was put in place a year ago, only a so-called hardship clause was supposed to offer a last resort. In practice, however, almost no applications under that clause are being approved. Now the SPD — one of Germany's major parties — is speaking out, calling the hardship rule far too strict and demanding a review. If you or someone you know holds subsidiary protection status in Germany, this development is directly relevant to your rights and options.
Subsidiary protection (subsidiärer Schutz) is a form of legal protection granted to people who do not qualify for full refugee status under the Geneva Convention but who cannot be returned to their home country because they face serious harm — such as armed conflict or torture. In Germany, this status is recognized by BAMF and comes with a residence permit, but it carries fewer rights than full refugee status.
One of the key differences is family reunification. While people with full refugee status have a legal right to bring immediate family members to Germany, those with subsidiary protection have historically faced stricter limits. The current suspension has effectively closed that door almost entirely.
When family reunification for subsidiary protection holders was suspended, a hardship clause was introduced to handle exceptional cases — situations where keeping a family separated would cause disproportionate suffering. In theory, this was meant to be a humane safety valve.
In practice, the numbers tell a different story. According to reports, barely any hardship applications are being approved. Critics argue that the criteria are so narrow and the bar so high that the clause is effectively meaningless. Families with sick children, elderly dependents, or documented trauma are still being turned away.
The SPD has now publicly criticized this situation, stating that the hardship rule is being applied far too strictly and calling for a serious review of how these cases are assessed. The party argues that the current practice contradicts both the spirit of the law and basic humanitarian principles.
The SPD's criticism is not a minor internal debate — it reflects growing political pressure to revisit how Germany handles family reunification for one of its most vulnerable resident groups. While no legislative changes have been announced yet, the public statement signals that this issue is returning to the political agenda.
Key points raised by the SPD include:
It is important to note that as of now, the law has not changed. Any future reform would require a parliamentary process.
Formal family reunification for subsidiary protection holders remains suspended. The only current route is the hardship clause, which requires demonstrating exceptional circumstances. Given the very low approval rate, it is strongly recommended to consult a qualified immigration lawyer or a recognized refugee advisory service before applying, so your case is presented as strongly as possible.
There is no fixed public checklist, but hardship applications are generally assessed on a case-by-case basis. Factors that may be considered include serious illness of a family member, dependency relationships, or proven exceptional humanitarian need. However, given the low approval rate, legal advice is essential. Contact organizations such as the Diakonie, Caritas, AWO, or a local refugee counseling center (Flüchtlingsberatungsstelle) for guidance.
Political criticism is an important first step, but legal changes take time and require majority support in the Bundestag. There is no guaranteed timeline. Monitor official announcements from BAMF and the Federal Ministry of the Interior for any updates.
No. People recognized as refugees under the Geneva Convention (Flüchtlingsschutz) retain their right to family reunification under separate legal provisions. This suspension specifically concerns those with subsidiary protection status.
The near-total blockage of family reunification for subsidiary protection holders is a serious issue affecting thousands of people in Germany. The SPD's public criticism is a sign that political debate on this topic is reopening, but no legal changes are in force yet.
If you are affected, the most important step is to seek qualified legal or advisory support before submitting any application. Document your family situation carefully, gather any medical or humanitarian evidence, and contact a refugee advisory organization in your area. Stay informed through official BAMF communications, as any policy changes will be announced there first.
Source: tagesschau
Want news like this in your inbox?
The most relevant news for expats in Germany, no noise.
The AfD could make history in Saxony-Anhalt's state election. Here's what that means for migrants and people with a migration background living in Germany.
The AfD is using provocative live streamers to amplify its political message in Germany. Here's what this media strategy means for the political climate expats live in.
Unions, churches and sports clubs join forces to offer practical help to victims of right-wing extremist attacks and threats in Germany — including support for volunteers.
